The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these effected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pictures has two charts, one is pie chart and another one is tabular chart. The pie chart shows the reason of globalisation land degradation into four parts and tabular chart shows the cause of degradation of three regions in proportion.
Overall, the main cause of less productivity was over-grazing whereas, other sources were only the least factors। of degradation. Apart from this, Europe was the main reason of land degradation with various factors among the other regions.
At the fleeting glimpse it is conspicuous that, it observed from pie chart that over-grazing was the cause of land degrade that was 35% and another major reason of degradation by deforestation that contains 30%. In addition to it, over-cultivation was also effected the land that was 28%.
On the another side, Europe was the main region which effected the land with various effect that was 9.8% by deforestation, 7.7% by over-cultivation and 5.5% by over-grazing. Moreover, in Oceania 11.3% land degrade by over-grazing. Whereas, North America was the least region of degradation with 0.2% by deforestation and 3.3% by over-cultivation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | cocococo123 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | cocococo123 | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Harkrishanverma | 73 | view |
- Noise pollution is increasing day by day and is affecting the quality of people s lives What are the main causes of noise pollution What should be done to reduce this problem 69
- If racism and xenophobia are attitude that we are taught not born with then the problems that come from them can be resolved Discuss this view and give your own opinion 80
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these effected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compar 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32777777778 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21690653491 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4242736201 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183635783869 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088384305904 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623190751802 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124037016328 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539047972751 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.