Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your argument.
The Butterfly Effect, "A butterfly's wings flap could set off a tornado," in chaos theory, is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions in which a small change in one state can result in large differences in a later state. The theory that even an inconspicuous event can have large effects than expectation could be cited by a group of people to prove the significance of "knowing every event." Unfortunately, these people neglect the changing speed of small incidents. On the contrary, the theory presents a distinct challenge to prediction in meteorology for its frequent alterations. Therefore, it is unnecessary to be so on the top of things for they could become outdated in the blink of an eye. And as a matter of fact, getting every information is far too time-consuming, information varies rapidly in the cyber world, and they are untold. Furthermore, to gather information is one thing, and to exploit is another. How much of the information could benefit usually lies in how thoughtful the reactions could be, more information does not always result in better choices.
First off, events are fluid. Their time-effectiveness is suspicious. For instance, in the human body, cells are replaced at a rate of about 2 million per second so that all the events are expired instantly in the next second. Assuming that some of the cells, during the process of reproduction, occur abnormality in the succeeding seconds and after that, they escape from the supervision of immune system then eventually cause tumor disease after decades, that awareness of the circumstances in the previous second, even the interval time is short, is worthless. Thus, for the sake of timeliness, keeping up with every event is unnecessary.
Next, knowing about every event, the behavior itself is unfeasible. It had been found impractical since a few decades ago when the internet had not been invented. Try looking into the history, the circulation of English newspapers rose from 39 million to 122 million, according to Wikipedia, convey billions and billions of messages in 1836 after the reduction of the stamp tax. Think about how to know all of them, begin with countryside newspaper, local news, followed by domestic, then regional and ending with global, you would figure out that no such human can deal with the enormous information even with lifetime efforts.
Finally, taking advantages of information not only requires consciousness but the skills of analyzing also. Theoretically, to identify the sources preferentially, to filter the information subsequently, and to act on it or delete it ultimately are the three pillars of reaction mechanisms. A message is no more than a message until different people see different meanings behind it and then it depends on how they respond. In World War II, engineers of Allies found many airplanes retreating successfully from air battles with lots of bullets holes concentrated on their wings and tail fins, so they decided to reinforce these parts with steel board. But the truth is they were wrong; those airplanes did not come back because they were shot on engines or cockpits rather than those minor parts and that caused the devastating crash. Such a misinterpretation is hilarious now but unfortunate for those pilots then even the information is real.
In a nutshell, knowing every event is not necessary and impractical in the modern cyber world for the events change so fast, the method is beyond human capacity, and the misunderstanding of information is such usual. There is an urge to subdue which obliges us to keep abreast of all current events, but in fact, the call is redundant. Lastly, it is advisable that sorting out the critical information and responding to it thoughtfully with wisdom are way better than just devouring it voraciously.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your argument. 90
- Directions: Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words.Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people d 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The Butterfly Effect, 'A butterflys...
^^
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...rflys wings flap could set off a tornado,' in chaos theory, is the sensitive depe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...antly in the next second. Assuming that some of the cells, during the process of reproducti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nsciousness but the skills of analyzing also. Theoretically, to identify the sources...
^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...nd to act on it or delete it ultimately are the three pillars of reaction mechanism...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 97.0 52.1666666667 186% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3210.0 1977.66487455 162% => OK
No of words: 622.0 407.700716846 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16077170418 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.99398916966 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05171291012 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 344.0 212.727598566 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 996.3 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5591625836 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.4 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.88 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129898093858 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033899747571 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036753524349 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760914692903 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254269520587 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 86.8835125448 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.