a better way to trip with the tour guide
Traveling is the best way to explore our selves around the world. Generally, people like to travel in a group of family or friends. Although the plethora of people hold the opinion that tour without tour guide gives privacy, I think that trip with the guide would be the best trip ever. I feel this way because of a few reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, with the company of guide man people can explore the world in a subtle way. People are always curious to know about the world's history. Since the world is very large and having information about the world is impossible, people need the help of the tour guide. For example, a group of people wants to visit Udaipur city which is situated in Rajasthan. There are many forts and heritage indicates the history of the city. If a group of people wants to know about their culture, religion, heritage, and language, they will know about it from tour guides.
The second and the same exquisite reason for this assertion is to make an easy trip due to having guidance from the people who belong to particular that area. In most of the tour, almost local people are tour guide over there. Therefore, they have information about that area since they were offspring. They have experienced the environment of the place, so they know more about that place than anybody can search it from the internet. For example, when I had visited Mount Abu with my family, we had hired a tour guide on our whole trip. We had already visited that are many times but we did not aware about their miniature history. That is why it was our best trip ever. It was our easer trip because that person had shown us some places which unknown to us. We had never been there as we had visited Mount Abu many times.
In a nutshell, based on the above-mentioned arguments, I think that having a tour guide in the trip makes the trip easier since people do not have to worry about the places which they should visit and get more information about the history and importance of the places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First of all, with the company of guid...
^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a subtle way" with adverb for "subtle"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... guide man people can explore the world in a subtle way. People are always curious to know abou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...le are always curious to know about the worlds history. Since the world is very large ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will know about it from tour guides. The second and the same exquisite reas...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s we had visited Mount Abu many times. In a nutshell, based on the above-ment...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... history and importance of the places.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53099730458 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23946236725 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479784366577 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0410831218 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.05 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.55 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271110770396 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084801536469 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107447297477 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19376862519 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817939916994 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.