Elder people are more efficient in working environment than younger people, discuss.
In the contemporary world, the conspicuous trend is observed regarding discrimination regarding employee's age. The elderly staff is treated differently in the workplace. Some people believe that there should not be any partiality when it comes to performance, whereas others argue that the young generation is much more efficient to perform any job. I am inclined to believe that any bias towards older personnel should be made illegal. Following paragraphs will succinctly discuss my point of view and will lead to a logical conclusion.
There is a myriad of argument to support my stance. The most preponderant one is that elderly people who are more experienced have more knowledge and skills to solve problems, and they are more responsible to handle any task. As they have spent more time in the field, they are more reliable and can perform much better than younger people. For example, in the aviation industry, experienced pilots are given an enormous responsibility to take care and fly airplane keeping in view the safety and wellness of passengers. Thus, it has become evident that old employees are performing better.
To further reinforce my statement, it is imperative to state that elderly people are productive than younger counterparts because senior employees who have to spend more time in the company have more understanding of the situations. They will not do any childish activity to harm the company. For instance, senior people have been found good workers in the field.
To conclude, this essay discussed the benefits and advantages of employing senior people. In my opinion, senior staff should be given more care and facilities so that they can perform much better than younger people, and young employees should learn from senior staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-18 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- How does the design of the building affect either positively or negatively where people work and live 70
- Film/Media learning for students 100
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or is it the responsibility of producers, discuss. 77
- Credit cards are beneficial for people, discuss 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23157894737 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79756302514 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1191033631 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277634229762 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779399517673 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805076698859 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165718691601 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357409126793 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.