The map shows the change in Jakarta (1950 – 2000).
The map illustrates the alterations in Jakarta between 1950 and 2000. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the number of hotels in 2000.
To begin with, 1950 to 1975 witnessed significant changes for the amount of four additional hotels, which one was located beside 2 hotels and opposite a dock in previous time and others were replaced in the opposite of the three docks and beside a hotel in 1950. Furthermore, there were new lane roads which had been developed in the place of lane road in previous time. In contrast, the existence of the docks and the beach remained unchanged over the following 25 years.
In accordance with next alterations, the number of hotels uplifted dramatically from 1975, which was at 7 hotels, to 2000, which made up to 13 hotels, and all of it run alongside the beach and the lane road. The presence of the beach, additionally, had been relocated to the southwest of the previous place where a new airport was constructed in the east part of the town. In contrast, the existence of docks had been permanently erased by the end of period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-13 | lethianhthu | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | hanbnguyenle | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | NajlaM | view | |
| 2022-11-03 | Jamjam23 | 84 | view |
- Line graph : Clothing Export in 1999 - 2003 in Japan, Colombia and Myanmar. 73
- Government should focus spending only on public services, not waste on the arts. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72959183673 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66114838848 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3857706132 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174205725089 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919429035159 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144570319644 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164956416706 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161441457545 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.