The chart below shows the Japan’s population by age
groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to
2040
The line graph illustrates the number of people in different three age group include children from 0 to 14 years old, adults between 25 and 64 years old and elders over 65 years old in Japan from 1960 and give some prediction in the next 20 years by 2040.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there are considerably downward trends for the Japanese population in two age group 0-14 and 25-64 while this figure for people aged over 65 years old grows dramatically. Another interesting point is that although had some slight fluctuation the number of people in the group 25-64 is forecasted to remain to contribute the largest large proportion over the next 20 years.
Looking at the detail, started at 65% in 1960 the population between 25 and 64 years old stayed unchanged till 2000 then fell down by 5% by 2019 and is predicted to experience a drop at nearly 59% by 2040. Similarly, in 1960 the number of children between 0 to 16 was just half of this figure for 25-64 group, at 30% then fluctuated enormously in next 40-year period, declined by 10% in 2000 and by 15% in 2019. This trend is anticipated to remain for the rest of the period given and will hit a trough at exactly 10 in 2040.
By contrast, the number of elders witnessed a remarkable improvement from 5% in 1960, surpassed this figure for children group in 2010, ranked the second place the reach 30% by 2019 which is six times as high as its data at beginning point. Furthermore, people make a long-term forecast that this figure will continuously peak at over 35% by 2040.
- The map below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day 68
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23-65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008. 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 73
- The pie charts show the results of a survey conducted by a university on the opinion of full time and part time students about its services 80
- moving from rural areas to big cities 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, second, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54804270463 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5268257194 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523131672598 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.60771543086 75% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.2333814519 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.75 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.125 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787946756788 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371738369155 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235483502032 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505819236838 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105849600225 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 50.2224549098 139% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.3001002004 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.