The line graph below shows the money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria.
The figure elucidates the amount of money spent on books in several European Nations between 1995 and 2005. At first glance, it is evident that in comparison with states, France is the merely country which faced a dramatic upsurge over the entire period.
To begin with, there was a remarkable growth for spending money on books in Germany from 1995, which made up at 80, to 1999, which constituted at 90. Nevertheless, it experienced a gradual palpitation in the next 6 years to achieve at just below 100. Following the same pattern as Germany, there was a considerable fluctuation in Italy where it, initially, stood at 50 and terminated to just above 60 by the end of the period shown.
In contrast, 1995 to 2005 witnessed tremendous progress for money spent on books in France where it upright positioned at just beneath 60 in 1995 and peaked at well across 70 in 2005. At first, Austria has the same pattern as France from 1999, which was at 30, and 1999, which accounted for 40. Nevertheless, it remained stable in the following 2 years and afterwards, it uplifted enormously to just over 70 in the next 4 years.
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- The chart below shows the amount of good transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002. 73
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 61
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71065989848 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69757674627 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1452214289 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124986732245 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573743113567 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468056873809 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908832825453 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120400820326 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.