Sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas (1999 & 2004)
The shown tables give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 5 different European countries, between 1999 and 2004. Overall it can be seen that the UK increased drastically the sales of coffee up to 20 million, almost 13 times the amount spent in 1999.
Furthermore, more than triple was spent in the UK for bananas in 5 years time, going from 15 million to 47 and making the country the one that invested the most.
Among the other 4 considered countries (Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, Sweden), no other drastic changes are to be found: in fact, Switzerland spent 3 million in coffee in 1999 and double the amount in 2004, almost as Belgium that increased by 0.7 million in 5 years. Both Denmark and Sweden spent 0.2 million dollars more from 1999 to 2004 in the import of Fairtrade-labeled coffee.
Surprisingly, whilst sales of bananas and coffee increased in most countries from 1999 to 2004, however, in Sweden and Belgium sales of bananas decreased from 1.8 to 1 million euros and 2 to 0.9 million euros respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world s oil in OPEC and non OPEC countries Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people believe that we have too many choices these days. To what extent to you agree or disagree?To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impact? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88333333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92589017793 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2071195656 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369569316445 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21377942738 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140481016188 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235961076779 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137645493852 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.