The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and banannas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tables illustrate the number of two bnanans and coffee sold in five distinct European countries in 1999 and 2004.
It is obvious that all countries have increased the sales of coffee from 1999 to 2004, it is true for bananas except Denmark and Sweden countries which decreased. In addition, the lowest number related to the beliugm thoroughly in these years. Denmark in 2004 has the lowest the number of million and Switzerland the highest thoroughly between two tables.
As can be seen, the United Kingdom increased significantly by more than 18 million euros from 1.5 in 2004, Switzerland has doubled in the number of sales and the other three remaining groups did not change substantially in selling coffee. In contrast, Sweden and Denmark declined in sales by ordering 0.8 and 1.1 from 1.8 and 2. Although the United Kingdom and Belgium have raised by about 4.5 and 3.4 million euros Switzerland's sugar sharply near a half million euros to 47 in sales of bananas in 2004.
As a result, people have more tendency to buy coffee in these five countries and all of their rates increased in 2004. Bananas by 2004 were good in Switzerland.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-04 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-08-04 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user Ahmad_off :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition, in contrast, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85204081633 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56548450502 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9971940923 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171609270217 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793973561343 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698196156826 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132618102822 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625421108141 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.