Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think it is a good idea that teenagers collaborate at unpaid community services and it should be mandatory at schools. This essay disagrees that students must work for these services.
Studying at high school is very important for each student. Because at this time, they should take many critical decisions for their future. For example, they choose their university major or future job. Thus, they need more time for studying and planning. If they have to work for unpaid community services, it can damage their plans because work for charities take so time. Furthermore, teenagers have different characters at this time. Many of them are shy and it is cough for them to work at social activities. So, it can hurt their character.
Although mature students can improve their social abilities with work for community services and help other people, these activities should be optional. For example, when collaborating at community services be an optional part of a secondary school program, students who have more time or how are interested can work for these services. This optional activity is an opportunity for teenagers to learn about charities or they can learn to teach with teaching their own knowledge to other people.
To sum up, taking part in unpaid community service can be an optional activity at secondary schools. If these activities are optional, not only poor people give help, but also students can develop their social talents. But if it is a mandatory part of the schools' program, it can hurt students' plans and studies.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Many people believe that formal “pen and paper” examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 67
- The two maps below show roads access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08560311284 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59872079796 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494163424125 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8075950038 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6875 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0625 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266128571677 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102874733191 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643827648704 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188217954287 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454524638657 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.