The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008
The bar charts compare the percentage of males and females when they got married, on the six different age groups in 1996 and 2008.Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of getting married in the female group has the highest rate in the 25-29 age group, while for the men group was 30-34 age group.
The age group of the 16-19 years old has the lowest percentage of getting married with to women less than 1% in 1996 and 2008.converserly ,There were no man in his group got married
. The figures of the 20-24 age group decreased from 6% to 3% for women and from over 2% to under 2% for men. Meanwhile, the number of 25-29 age group remain unchanged at under 12% for women ,but it rose slightly for men with 8% by 2008. For those age groups older than the age of 30
, the number of getting married still increased gradually to 8% for women and 11% for men in the 30-34 age group. The number of females who got married aged 35-39 increased only 1 % in 2008, while men of that age group climbed to 9%. Lastly, the figures of both male and female remained unchanged in the 40-44 age group.
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 56
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- age when getting married by the group 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...x different age groups in 1996 and 2008.Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ess than 1% in 1996 and 2008.converserly ,There were no man in his group got marri...
^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere were no man in his group got married . The figures of the 20-24 age group dec...
^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e were no man in his group got married . The figures of the 20-24 age group decr...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... remain unchanged at under 12% for women ,but it rose slightly for men with 8% by ...
^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose age groups older than the age of 30 , the number of getting married still i...
^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se age groups older than the age of 30 , the number of getting married still in...
^^
Line 4, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... , the number of getting married still increased gradually to 8% for women and ...
^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ained unchanged in the 40-44 age group.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31553398058 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26615519174 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7112717834 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192980560501 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110894757219 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659925614736 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146797909291 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450702881288 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.37 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.