In the reading, the author lists three theories to explain the source which cause the odd noises in the ocean
However, the professor challenges each theory mentioned in the reading and she states that there is not enough evidence to detect exactly what is the cause of the strange noises.
The first theory claims that the odd noises are produced by the ocra whales. The professor states that although this theory seems plausible at first but it ultimately highlighted unlikely. She explains that ocra whales live in the surface of the waters, while the submarines are in deep waters. Given the distance between the submarines and the living place of whales, it is impossible for the submarines to hear the odd noises from the surface of the ocean. As a result, the odd noises were not produces by the ocra whales. In fact, these strange noises have another source which is near the submarines not very far away them.
According to the second theory, giant squids produce the strange sounds. However the professor challenges this theory by stating a brief history of date of appearing and disappearing the odd sounds. She explains that the first sounds were heard by the submarines in 1960. After two decades of continuing the sounds, they disappeared in the 1980. While the giant squids continue living in the ocean, so if they were responsible for producing the odd sounds, why the sounds were stopped in 1980? If the giant squids were the true source of producing the sounds, the sounds should have continued during 1980th.
Lastly, the author mentions the third theory which shows that the sounds are produced by the Russian submarines. However, the professor rebuts that these sounds could be produced by another country submarines. The submarines cannot change their directions quickly, on the other hand, the strange sounds' direction were changed quickly and moved around. It is the main reason by which the professor rejects the last theory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-21 | houra12345 | 73 | view |
- In the reading, the author lists three theories to explain the source which cause the odd noises in the ocean 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to read books about real events than it is for them to read novels. 66
- which one do you prefer before taking a vacation?Reading about places online or discussing them with someone who has visited the proposed places. 73
- states that R. robustus could not activtly hunt the dinosaur in its stomach for three reasons 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to read books about real events than it is for them to read novels.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at is the cause of the strange noises. The first theory claims that the odd noi...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the submarines not very far away them. According to the second theory, giant sq...
^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...iant squids produce the strange sounds. However the professor challenges this theory by...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should have continued during 1980th. Lastly, the author mentions the third th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, third, while, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42333207381 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486928104575 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6582663358 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5294117647 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207348202423 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694729590408 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547726019122 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115120304613 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060044683844 0.0443174109184 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.