Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-
being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that
the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to
make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your
own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
A question is usually raised in public discussion: should corporations be oriented only to increasing profits or should they be commited to the wellness of the society in which they operate? In what follows, I will defend the position according to which corporations are responsible for a good development of society.
First of all, making profits as much as possible without worrying about the conditions of society seems to be ethically wrong to most of us. Indeed, the consequence is an unequal distribution of richness and power. That is to say, the owner of a successful activity is far more powerful of a common citizens; if he does nothing to diminish this discrepancy, the social systems in which his corporation operate can hard be defined as democracy.
Not only is the no-responsibility position immoral, it can imply negative consequences. For example, suppose that a certain factory only tries to achieve his goal of increasing his profit indefinetely. Moreover imagine that the state in which it is located have not formulated particular envornomental rules yet. Of course, even if the factory roaised level of pollution, its actions would be legal. Yet, most of us think that such a factory should not have increased the amount of pollution.
Of course, there are some objections that some people may move against the position I am supporting. For example, it could be objected that corporations can augment the wellness of society just by increasing their profit. Indeed, the higher their profit, the more healthy the economy. However, this seems to be a gross idea. The discrepancy between rich people and poor people,and the risk of a non-democratic system cannot be prevented, as well as the possibility of environmental problems. Yet, some people may insist by arguing that requiring that a corporation has the responsibility for the wellness of society is too much. After all, people are not commited to this ethical duty; why should corporation be? However, first it is not completely true that people do not have such a duty: you must not damage the envoronment in which other peole live. Second, the analogy between people and corporations is suspect. The impact that a corporation can have on a society is greater; the greater the power the more the responsibility.
In conclusion, corporation should be responsible for the wellness of the society in which they operate. Arguing the contrary faces both ethical problems and negative consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | fugitate | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | underwoodkats1 | 54 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 66
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 54
- The following appeared in a health magazine published in Corpora.“Medical experts say that only one-quarter of Corpora’s citizens meet the current stan-dards for adequate physical fitness, even though twenty years ago, one-half of all ofCorpora’s ci 86
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
...tivity is far more powerful of a common citizens; if he does nothing to diminish this di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... of increasing his profit indefinetely. Moreover imagine that the state in which it is l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ancy between rich people and poor people,and the risk of a non-democratic system can...
^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblems and negative consequences.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, of course, as well as, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17866004963 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04873423927 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506203473945 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0334292505 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8636363636 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13636363636 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311788922759 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089100882761 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881877556465 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189431651516 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861749597333 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.