Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Creativity is a vital tool for children to produce new ideas. In this world, having new ideas means surviving. Some people believe that children had more creativity in the past than they have today. Others tent to disagree. I strongly assert that children possess more creativity nowadays for two main reasons.
Children have more access to the internet and new ideas. Internet is a vast medium through which, all people around the world share their ideas. When you observe these ideas, they affect your creativeness, and it can help you to produce your own innovative ideas. In the past, children were deprived of such a medium. They had to create their thoughts without knowing what ideas were trendy or which ones were old-fashioned. When I was attending high school, we had an assignment in which we were asked to write an essay about our country. After several hours of struggling, eventually, I decided to obtain ideas on the internet. During skimming sample essays, I developed my own idea. Finally, I wrote that essay flawlessly with a well-fostered subject. I strongly believe that I could not do that without the help of the internet.
Besides, there are too many educational materials for children to develop their creativeness nowadays. Many parents are becoming more concerned about the future of their children. The Education system is which aiming at fostering children with a more innovative mind is becoming predominant in schools. previously, nobody had such an obsession in children’s education, which parents have today. If we can implement such discipline children will be more creative and successful in the future.
Nowadays, new ideas are more appreciated by people around the world. In this case, children are more willing to be more creative. By using the internet and new technologies, everybody is able to produce its ideas and shares them with each other. Ideas that have not experienced by people are worthless. Whenever the idea is spread by its creator, it gains more value.
To sum up the argument, children have more medium to share their ideas. In a world with advanced technologies and productive education systems, children are able to create new ideas and spread them easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following question? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ideas'' or 'idea's'?
Suggestion: ideas'; idea's
...ce new ideas. In this world, having new ideas means surviving. Some people believe th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Previously
...ind is becoming predominant in schools. previously, nobody had such an obsession in childr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11263736264 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73879329433 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0576021203 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.9259259259 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4814814815 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.51851851852 5.45110844103 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189336855374 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553121684911 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551656084104 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114078769648 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477157224894 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.