Chart
The given chart illustrates the proportion of men, women and children consuming 5 portions of fruit each day in the period of 2001 to 2008. Overall, it is apparently seen that the biggest consumption was by women, while chilren ate much less. The total amount of usage rose steadily over the given period, however declining in the last two years.
In terms of females the figure was 20% at the beginning, which gradually rose to nearly a third in 2006, afterwards falling to around 30%.
As for men and children, the fruit consumption remained constant for the first three years with a percentage about 16% and just over a tenth respectively. The usage by these categories witnessed a slight fluctuation over the folowing 5 years. Male consumers of food were slighly more than a fifth in 2004. This number grew to roughly 27 per cent in two years, later seing a minor fall by a small fraction of about 2%. A similar progress was observed for children: in 2004 the figure was slightly more than 15%, which faced a gradual growth in the following 3 years, reaching a peak of exactly a quarter and declining for hust 2% in the next year.
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT E-BOOKS AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY WILL TOTALLY REPLACE TRADITIONAL NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINES. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. 89
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Agree / disagree 3
- some people prefer to take courses over the internet. what are advantages of such courses? 71
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63861386139 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55058133579 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648514851485 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2608352759 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0471718893786 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207567776725 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587090329911 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351579206416 0.15604864568 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497208081963 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.