The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology has been increasing over the globe today. A recent few decades are witness of developing in technology sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to phenomenon, faction of outfits believe that mobile phones has been banned as smoking in certain places. While other argue that it should not be done. I will try to throw light upon a pros and cons of mobile phones. As well as I will try posit my perspective about it.
To commence with, there are multifarious reason to shore the view of prohibition of usage of mobile phone in some places. The primary reason is distraction through the cell phones. To Justify. Since, people who use station, they can lose their attention from work or study. Consequently they get worse result. Furthermore, the second demerits of usage of mobile phone is a main source of disintegration between the family. To be precised, in recent time people use this device all time without interact with other people face to face. Thereby, people may have to be suffered from less relation with family members.
On the other side of spectrum, there are plethora advantages of mobile phones. The first main reason is that cell phones have more benefits like they have some important features or apps. They may use the maps to reach their destination without having any curb. The second reason for using cellphone is to interact with family members who stay away from home. To explain, while students or people who give abroad for their study or work, they access the mobile phones to communicate with family members through making a phone call or even video call which tend to make convenient for people to overcome the problem of feeling home-sickness.
Aggelomerating, all the points to conclude that mobile phones have more pros for people as well as community outweigh the cons. But from my perspective, cell should be used in proper way without having adverse affect of mobile phones.
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 73
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree 73
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the Sun. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en banned as smoking in certain places. While other argue that it should not be done....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...ose their attention from work or study. Consequently they get worse result. Furthermore, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly they get worse result. Furthermore, the second demerits of usage of mobile p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95795795796 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57362788636 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3027193067 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.619047619 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208709009067 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577315221839 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636681620885 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13806002709 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226430144581 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.