The chart show the percentage of adult population with different categories in a city in 2003 and 2013
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of adult maturation with six categories in a city in 2003 and 2013.
Overall, the figure of adult population who work in business was highest in 2003. In 2013, a rapid increase in the percentage of self-employed adult while there was a slight decrease in unemployed categories.
Regading business categories, in 2003 the number of people work in business was approximate 50%, compared to 21% in medical. By constract, the figure for education training and hotel industry was far lower, at only 9% and 3% respectively. The proportion of hotel categories was lowest, peak at under 5%, just a half of education training.
In 2013, there was a sharp grow in the percentage of self-employed categories, reached a peak at 32%, was six times of unemployed. Besides, this year also remarkable flourish evolve of three categories such as education training, hotel industry and building, it was over 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | Doan Cuong HUS | 61 | view |
- The chart show the percentage of adult population with different categories in a city in 2003 and 2013 61
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions. 67
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 67
- The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of self-employed categories, reached a peak at 32%, was six times of unemploy...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11038961039 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06474933402 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.5724931014 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.375 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241993398729 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11946495236 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132878978832 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195424674233 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155930433326 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.