Nowadays, more and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
The advent of modern technologies has changed the ways people live their lives and complete work. Now, many job opportunities, especially those with heavily physical requirements, are took by advanced machines. And many people think this tendency in a positive light.
In comparison with human, machines have clear advantages in those workplaces. Firstly, they can protect workers from getting hurt physically. For example, decades ago, people worked at busy harbours had to move a lot of heavy cargos in a short time by themselves, which means that they should bend over hundreds of times and might get hurt easily in their backs or legs. But with machines taking over this job, their jobs has changed into computer controllers or drivers. Hence they may become safer in their daily work and improve their life expectancy. Additionally, machines works more efficiently than common workers. They do not take sick leaves and do not need to rest for the weekends, hence they are perfect production tools that can meet the requirements of a stressful production process and a highly prosperous economy.
Although those machines can serve better than human beings in heavy physical jobs, there is no denying that this kind of machines may occupy job opportunities of normal people and lead to their unemployment. Human become replaceable in this workplace. And many factories or companies may recognise machines as their first choice in the workplace involving heavy physical work. Unemployment may result in high criminal rates and unstable society, if the government cannot tackle this problem immediately.
Overall, machines show clear advantages in doing physically heavy jobs comparing with human being. Workers can improve their job prospects by attending vocational training or accept higher education. Instead of preventing the technological development in the workplace to save their jobs, they can choose to change their roles in the workplace. For instance, after professional training, they might become computer controllers to control machines to do the heavy jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...with heavily physical requirements, are took by advanced machines. And many people t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...his tendency in a positive light. In comparison with human, machines have clear advanta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...d into computer controllers or drivers. Hence they may become safer in their daily wo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43827160494 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80510562881 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.827586915 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180848671814 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631765782462 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479273878044 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113301398014 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225519772736 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.