Many people have pets. Others don't have. In your opinion, is it a good idea to have pet, such as a bird, dog, or cat?
Having a company is an important part of our life. Many people in the world choose pets as a company and treat them like actual family members. On the other hand, some people who have never had pets, and don’t understand why many people have pets, would prefer to not have animals in their home. In my view, having pets is a good idea for two important reasons.
First, as pets are alive creatures, they need to drink and eat and primary needs of a life. Therefore, having them make us to be responsible with taking care of them. For example, last year I got a dog and after the first few days she looked so bored. It really upset my family and we visited a veterinarian to help us, and I knew that I have to take the dog on a walk because she need it. For this reason I took her to park . Although it was so difficult for me and took my time, but it made her happy and active. I kept it on and devoted three hours of my day-time to take care of her. As you can see, having pets increase our responsibility.
Second, you can rely on your pet like a close friend. If you have a dog you, you will feel having a good company. A company that is close to you and makes you be happy and when you come back to home from work, she jumps on you and play with you and you would feel like that you have a friend who has been waiting to see. Furthermore, she can be a good partner to encourage you to do exercise. For instance, when my dog and I were going to the park, we were running around the park a lot. However I was tired, I ran more because I was motivated by watching her incentive. This experience encouraged me to do more exercise each day.
Without a doubt, having pets is so beneficial because even though, some people may say pets are dirty and having them is so expensive, as I mentioned, they have many good effects on your life and I really recommend you to experience it and then judge it on your own experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-11 | Reza.milad | 92 | view |
- Succsess people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 60
- Many people have pets Others don t have In your opinion is it a good idea to have pet such as a bird dog or cat 92
- Success people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.do you agree or disagree with this statement? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Community 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bers. On the other hand, some people who have never had pets, and don't unde...
^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d it. For this reason I took her to park . Although it was so difficult for me and...
^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... we were running around the park a lot. However I was tired, I ran more because I was m...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d then judge it on your own experience.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.12234042553 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30243921759 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507978723404 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1234627802 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350848411092 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105285015358 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120382544953 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259031830747 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149019595486 0.0645574589148 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 58.1214874552 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.62 10.9000537634 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.