In the past, lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays, new technology is increasingly being used to teach students.
Do the advantages of this new approach outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, the role of advanced technology is a major topic of concern in today's world. It becomes a practical way to educate pupils, and gradually replaces the role of lectures as a teaching method in the education system. I contend that such a way is of paramount importance to the sustainable development of the modern society.
First, under today's context of globalization and international integration, the use of new technology is a practical way in which students can rely on to foster their professional development. In the past, lectures were usually time-consuming. Nowadays, advanced technology could reduce the amount of time which students have to spend on their research, thereby enhancing the quality of the content of their product. For example, computers would be convenient for pupils to find information. Another point to add is that computers also ensure the accuracy and reality of the information.
By adopting more helpful method, the education system could satisfy the students' requirement of teaching. In doing so, they would be provided an opportunity to approach modern society in a different and proactive way and gain more profound knowledge of many surroundings more effectively. Furthermore, this development could be positive in providing students with the technical skills that would be indispensable to the long-lasting development of the fast-paced and globalized world.
In conclusion, although lectures were originally one of the traditional approach of teaching an abundance of students all over the world, advanced technology is still a positive development that could predominate over the role of the original method. I hope that in the future, people should adopt more and more new technology to keep students motivated to learn and enhance the quality of our education system in the long term.
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 11
- Subjects such as Art, Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjects such as Information Technology. Many people think children suffer as a result of these changes. To what extent would support or reject the idea of moving these 78
- In the past, lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays, new technology is increasingly being used to teach students.Do the advantages of this new approach outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals because individuals can do little. Agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that gun weapon must be legal for protecting their selves whereas other people reject it. Which one you agree or disagree and give the reasons. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...nt of the modern society. First, under todays context of globalization and internatio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... the education system could satisfy the students requirement of teaching. In doing so, t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35395189003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13645380918 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522336769759 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9631112652 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196948298174 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636421003602 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458186260433 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114407354544 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305457294252 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.