Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities, which are played alone. To what extent to you agree or disagree?
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%">Different skills are required to attain the objective of any
activity. Activities which are played in group propel one to learn other skills
for life than activities that are played solo. I totally agree to the above
statement and would like to discuss the same in the following paragraphs. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%">To commence with, man is a social animal who loves to mingle
with its own group. If man keeps himself or herself aloof, the learning gets
deteriorated. The more the man socializes, the better he or she becomes. For
instance, if a child is allowed to play with friends, he or she develops
holistically. The skills that are learned in team are co-operation,
communication, leadership, team spirit, patience, creative, and management.
These skills help the child to be successful in other spheres of life. Similarly,
the employers always hire the candidates who carry skills that are required to
make work atmosphere positive. Despite having the appropriate qualifications,
candidates are rejected due to fewer skills. So, to be a skill oriented has
become pre-requisite to get employed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%">On the other hand, activities that are played alone keep the
learning at bay. One becomes rigid and a convergent thinker. For example, some
parents do not permit their wards to mingle with others. They show reluctance because
they feel that their child may fall into a bad company. This attitude of the
folks hampers the development of that child. The child begins to remain in
isolation, and create his or her own world. Thus, he or she hesitates to be a
part of any group. The chances of becoming introvert are on rise which puts him
or her in to the domain of inflexibility. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;
line-height:115%">To sum up, activities that are done in group have loads of
advantages. Moreover, it pushes one to become skilled to face any challenges
come across in life.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and giv 61
- PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- PIE CHART ON DIFFERENT EXPENDITURES ON MOVIE 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both the views and giv 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, similarly, so, thus, for example, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.61656441718 5.12529762239 129% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 6.8299962139 2.80592935109 243% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579754601227 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.4195419704 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5238095238 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.38176352705 685% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106081401668 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441635917407 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703687801054 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417874218194 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638638226355 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.82 12.4159519038 168% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.