The chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries.
The chart shows comparing waste management about levels of recycling as landfill, recycled/composted, incineration and other for fifteen European countries.
If we look carefully, Greece have the highest rate by %90 while %8 of waste management belong to Denmark in landfill. In recycled/composed, Austria is lead by nearly % 85 whereas Greece has the smallest rate by %10. To turn 2 waste management which is incineration and other, Denmark and Luxembourg are almost same rate by %60 for incineration, in other side Germany uses other method for waste by around %12 in using this method mostly.
To continue with, Belgium uses methods equally about landfill and incineration by %25, and also they use recycled/composted method by % 50. In addition, for incineration, UK and Italy use equal by %9 for waste management. Spain follows the Germany about using other method by %7 .
To sum up, most of European country use the landfill method for waste management while incineration and recycled/composed method are used nearly equal rate. Other methods are used with more less or none rate by country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | faraj27 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | Muhammed_10 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Limeluminous | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in twentieth century. 61
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ste management about levels of recycling as landfill, recycled/composted, inciner...
^^
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Greece) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...untries. If we look carefully, Greece have the highest rate by %90 while %8 of was...
^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e Germany about using other method by %7 . To sum up, most of European country u...
^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...equal rate. Other methods are used with more less or none rate by country.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Other methods are used with more less or none rate by country.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28981506789 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8553463087 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108509196931 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563007140385 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744355642972 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984417098783 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090224584932 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.