The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar chart gives information about the proportion of american who frequently ate in fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most people in the USA went to fast food restaurants once a week, between 2003 and 2006, and once or twice a month in 2013. The percentage of people ate at unhealthy cuisine places on a daily basis is the lowest in all three years.
In 2003 and 2006, more than one-third of americans ate at a fast food restaurant once a week; however, these figures decreased significantly to around 28% in 2013. Moreover, the proportion of human going to eat junk food once or twice a month reached 30% in 2003, then it decreased by about 5% after three years. Nonetheless, a number of americans ate junk food experienced upward about 33% in 2013.
The ratio of people who had fast food as a meal several times a week fluctuated in all three years, approximately 18%, 20%, and 16% respectively. Furthermore, the figures of people going out to eat a few times a year are higher than daily eaters. Those who had never eaten in fast food accounted for very small percentages, ranging from 5% and 3%
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- Advertising is all around us; it is an unavoidable part of everyone's life. Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is entertaining But others say films should have educational value Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70066658438 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8014336503 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37152269234 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156936652278 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112796146595 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251958919575 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949141989744 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.