Every year several languages die out. This is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
it is often said that language disappearing is not crucial since it may make an easier living over all the countries. I completely disagree with this statement and I believe that there are several negative meanings for the disappearing.
To begin with, an existing language is the critical component of the culture. we may always discover that the hong kong protesters are protecting cantonese, which is the original language in hong kong, as soon as the government are going to promote Putonghua to be the new formal language instead of cantonese in hong kong. The reason of the forceful objection is that the local culture such as cantonese music will be vanish if the original language is abolished. Therefore, the influences of local culture are serious by the language disappearing.
language is also represented as a certification part of a country. The strongest example would be the evidence that the formal languages of each existing country are also different, for instance, Korean, Japan and France own their self-language separately. The significance is that the establishment of an own language is necessary for a certificated country, nowadays, we would not see that the official language of a country is come from other country. Thus, as long as there is a death of a language, a country will be invaded as well as disappeared by others clearly.
In conclusion, because of the disadvantages, like the vanishment of typical culture as well as the existence of a country, are outweighing the positive consequences, I believe that the circumstance of language disappearing is vital for the public or even the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extend do you agree? 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often said that language disappearin...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... the critical component of the culture. we may always discover that the hong kong ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Language
... serious by the language disappearing. language is also represented as a certification ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11610486891 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13194171419 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.647422657 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238496216982 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093905188952 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0162684467935 0.0667982634062 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136987768456 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023380334189 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.