The two diagrams illustrate the highway designing of an urban hospital between 2007 and 2010.
It can be clearly seen that the location of the various car park was separated after reconstruction. Overall, there were two circuit roads instead of the crossroad in 2010.
Before the renovated plan, there was a crossroad connected with city road and hospital road. Bus stops placed along both sides of the hospital road. After that, the crossroad was eliminated as well as replaced by the roundabout, which accessed to city road, hospital road and a new bus station. Also, it was available to the ring road by the second roundabout.
In 2007, there was just a car park, which opened for staff and public, set on the right side of the bus stops, vehicle drivers should attend via the entrance at ring road. By the road reestablishment, staffs were able to park their car with no public used since 2010 as there was an independent car park for staff on the original place as well as a public car park for public used only on the right side of the city hospital.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effects does it have on an individual and society? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64893617021 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51048052155 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.947096018 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170826098958 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915894593819 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557383411603 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117462912739 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496099229859 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.