Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: one can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes.
With the rise of the living standard, an increasing number of people attach great importance to adapt some measures to relax, such as reading some books or watching movies. Someone believes that people can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes, including someone’s personality, interests and hobbies and so on, and as far as I am concerned, this statement is tenable, the reasons of which are as follows.
To begin with, during reading the books that the person likes, it is beneficial to know what the person’s interests or hobbies are in his daily life. It is people’s interests that motivate people to take an action. And when people pick up the books, there exists the possibility that they might consider the books related to their interests. For one thing, sensitive people always like to read some comic books, which can give them power to face the challenge with smile and cheer them up. For another thing, realistic people prefer to choose the tragic story, which can let them realize a variety of thought- provoking problems. Besides, people who like sports could choose the books talking about football match or basketball match, so that they could have common topics to talk with their friends. Thus, on condition that people can know the books that another person likes, they will learn about the interests of a person.
In addition, knowing what is the person’s favorite book is conducive to learning about the working field of the person. Due to the fierce competition in modern society, more and more people are likely to enhance their ability to benefit their career by reading some books related to their fields, so that they would become more proficient in their field and get better position in the company. And people from all walks of life choose different kinds of books. In business field, people are more likely to read books about business aspects such as: management, economics, e-commerce and so on. And people who come from the field of law prefer to read judicial books, thus having deep understanding of fairness and justice to maintain the social stability. What’s more, in order to update teaching theory and accumulate abundant experience, it is a good method for teachers to read books to gain what they need. Obviously, people can learn another person’s working field by using this way.
From what has been discussed above, I draw a conclusion that people can learn another person by reading the books the another person likes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, thus, another thing, in addition, such as, talking about, for another thing, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00470588235 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51099285565 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496470588235 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6535027793 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.117647059 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314732989269 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127330163729 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128736980555 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260831444638 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805218910842 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.