One can learn a lot about another person from the books and the movies that the person likes.
Whenever it comes to the issue whether one can learn about another man from the books and movies he likes, there are never short of discussions. From my perspective, books and movies are essential for us to learn about others.
For starters, getting some informantion from what others like allow us to know his preference, which enable us to analysis his characters. It’s obvious that what a man likes to read reflect his aim or thoughts, and therefore, those factors allow us to know a man better. For instance, last time I joined an activity of a book club in my university. The activity aims on making friends by sharing our favorate book. That’s to say, one should write a letter to another student whom he had never met before. The letter should include the man’s thoughts and feelings about the content, and the other student should do the same. I received a letter which recommanded me some books about literature and poems. Therefore, I just assumed the author must be a someone who had high talent writing an essay. Since a person who likes poems is usually a girl who loves to observe life, I suspect that the author must be a girl who is outgoing and optimistic. Finally, we are introduced to our partner, and my assumption turned out to be right. This experience told me that books allow us to know others better.
Besides, learning about the books allow us to know some basic information about others, like his current situation. If someone is busy recently, he might prefer to read magazines, and if he is having a hard time with his work or schoolwork, he might read something which can encourage him to face difficulties. Therefore, learing about the books others are reading allow us to know their inner world, or what they perceive recently. Take my roommate as an example. Last semester, I always saw him reading books such as The Old Man And the Sea, which is a book that can always give us courage to take risks. In that case, I assumed he might failed in the mid-term exam, and he might use the book to encourage himself. Therefore, I consoled him about the exam. To my astonishment, he really didn’t do well in the exam, and my assumptions are right.
From the discussions above, we can reach the conclusion that we can learn out others from books and movies. We can analysis their characters and their current states. Will you try to know a man from the books he has read before?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-15 | pourmand1376 | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-07 | Greenbluemind | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-05 | Greenbluemind | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | Greenbluemind | 76 | view |
| 2020-11-23 | Chris Lee | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 750, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
...fore, I just assumed the author must be a someone who had high talent writing an essay. S...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, really, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65813953488 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53762280006 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479069767442 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7699312726 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4583333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295077865759 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814410442247 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845654188533 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217777107141 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105291542125 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.