The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two maps illustrate the layout of the island, before and after being added some tourist equipment. Overall, it is clear that from the comparison of the two maps, many facilities will be built on the island.
Starting with the first map, the island is about 250 meters and in the middle of it is an extremely large vacant land, with two groups of trees nearby. On the west of the island is a beach.
Turning now to the future development of the island, a group of accommodations will be built in the middle of the island, forming a circle and connected by a footpath. Another group of accommodations will be constructed around the trees in the west and will be also linked by a footpath, by which tourists can easily reach the beach where they can go swimming. Between the two housing areas will be a reception surrounded by a vehicle track. Through the track, travelers can go to a restaurant in the north and arrive at a pier where they can go sailing.
- There is a controversial view about whether group learning or independent learning is a better way to students’ study at school. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion. 73
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggestions? 78
- some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 85
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49714285714 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60933332638 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6127664916 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234897005905 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115784230107 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119704693903 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187597907547 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101979156585 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.