When choosing a job, salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the income is one of a crucial factor in choosing the career of new graduates. Many individuals adopt a view that when it comes to choosing a job, handsome incomes should be taken as the highest priority. In my opinion, It is disagreed that money plays essential role in choosing job of the new graduates. However, safety is equally important and job expectations should vary according to personal causes.
Firstly, people should recognize that new graduates are in a serious lack of working experience. Working in different fields can provide them an invisible asset that cannot be measured in terms of money such as a communication skill. The target of becoming well-rounded workers is more instrumental than financial income is, especially in the long run. This statement is particularly right in highly competitive labor markets, in which numerous candidates are in the race for a single position. Applicants are advised to take a salary negotiation slightly. Not only does it provide them career opportunities, but also brings a peaceful frame of mind in searching for work
Notwithstanding the mentioned justifications, the working environment and safety should be taken into account by qualified workers. Productive, effective workers should know their places in the labor market and ask for comprehensive demands in a job that is equivalent to their future contribution to the company. This is the reason for the fact that in many companies, senior workers are offered handsome income. Under most circumstances, such workers have “unwritten right” to expect a high salary and good welfare in jobs
In conclusion, on the career ladder, beginners are advised to hold expectations in search of work, low-paid jobs and a good training environment are still a good option. Yet comprehensive demand about good salary, safety is acceptable to senior.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 words. 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
- The two pie charts given compares the proportion of people who commuted to the university by five different means of transport over the course of 5 years from 2004 to 2009. 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to job'
Suggestion: to job
... money plays essential role in choosing job of the new graduates. However, sa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37373737374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17708482302 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6346796093 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127302399078 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041958893415 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495351806488 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743188935508 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680449333682 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.