THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE AMOUNT OF MONEY PER WEEK SPENT ON FAST FOODS IN BRITAIN.
THE GRAPH SHOWS THE TRENDS IN CONSUMPTION OF FAST FOODS.
WRITE A REPORT FOR A UNIVERSITY LECTURER DESCRIBING THE INFORMATION SHOWN BELOW
The bar chart illustrates how much money was expended per weeks on three of junk foods by income groups in Britain, while the line graph shows the number of fast foods consumed from 1970 to 1990. In general, it can be seen that the consumption of hamburgers increased over the period in the question, and the spending on these fast food of income groups was the most popular in Britain.
To begin, the amount of money on hamburgers in the high-income group was three times higher than the low-income group, approximately 40% and 14% respectively. Otherwise, there was half as the expenditure on the pizza of the average income as the high income, about 11% and 20% respectively.
Meanwhile, we can see from the graph that the consumption both of the hamburgers and the pizza saw an upward trend. In 1990, the hamburgers reached a peak, over 500 grammes while consume pizza was lower the hamburgers, about 280 grammes, between 1970 and 1990.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
- The table below shows the employment of students from four countries in the UK after their first courses in 2001 85
- The following two pie charts show the results of the survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among adults in 1985 and 1995 78
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia Australia in 2010. 73
- The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87564766839 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76732448058 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6626600249 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148155160372 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660278414025 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780590928579 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107536555818 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094247074959 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.