THE BAR CHART BELOW ILLUSTRATES THE USE TOBACCO PRODUCTS BY SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES
The bar chart gives data about how many students both middle school and high school use the various products of Tobacco( Anny Use, Cigarettes, Cigars, Smokeless, Pipes, Bidis, Kreteks)
Overall, high school students smoke is higher than middle school students. The most popular of Tobacco products of students is Anny Use, middle school students least prefered Kreteks and high school students show little interest in Pipes. Besides, the percentage of both group rate the highest in using the products: Any Use, Cigarettes, Cigars. However, the middle school students use both Any Use and Cigarettes are only a third the high school students and a half in using Cigars.
The other type of Tobacco products is less popular, around 3% in the percentage of students, high school is used each. Both Pipes and Birds are also attractive to high school students, but they are being more attracted by Smokeless and Kreteks,4% and 6% respectively.
To sum up, it can be seen that giving up smoking in middle school are impossible.
- THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED NUMBER OF VISITORS TO A NEW ART GALLERY FROM ITS OPENING DATE IN 1990 UP TO AND INCLUDING 2001 iT ALSO INDICATES THREE EVENTS IN THE GALLERY S LIFE BELOW THE CHART THERE ARE TWO PIE CHARTS WHICH SHOW THE SATI 70
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 78
- IT IS BETTER FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS TO LIVE FAR AWAY FROM HOME THAN LIVE AT HOME WITH THEIR PARENTS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
Comments
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, third, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05325443787 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46987380264 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7930112876 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336151234567 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175347123536 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111548541377 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204826746751 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119005795059 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.