Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for long time should be promoted to higher positions. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that only the professionals, who have long standing commitments with their organization, should be promoted to top positions. I fully support this stance since staff who is working in the company for years need to be rewarded for their commitment and such professionals are also aware of company rules and culture.
First of all, it is often observed that some people stay in one organization for years, serving the company and waiting for promotions. Such professionals work very hard to justify their position in the company and qualify for promotion, therefor they have a right to be promoted to top positions as a reward for their commitment. These are loyal employees of the company and rewarding them will increase the motivation level. Take the example of some multinational corporations who preferably elevate their employees through various ranks up to the top positions over the years. This culture also promote strong relations among colleagues.
Furthermore, people who have worked in the company for years are aware of rules and culture of the organization and if they are promoted to a higher position, it is easier for them to pursue the policies of the organization more effectively. According to a study conducted by a leading pharmaceutical company of Pakistan, the employees trained within the company and internally promoted are more efficient in implementing company policies than the ones hired from other organizations.
In conclusion, owing to the fact that internal promotion is a way to reward the loyal staff and can help to pursue the company policies more effectively and efficiently, I strongly support the idea that companies should only promote their long time employees to higher positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | Saqib042 | 67 | view |
| 2017-04-07 | Hussein1987 | 56 | view |
- Some doctors think people are not getting enough exercise these days. Why is this? and what can be done about it? 73
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problems as a result.Why do many working people not get enough exercise?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26164874552 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0064784475 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5170970053 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.8 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380835536478 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153025263198 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924015240787 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25617249583 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691294392479 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.