You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between
1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the percentage of older people having ages 65 and above living in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2020. Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, the total number of such individuals in all three countries had increased over time, but more significantly in Japan.
At the beginning of time frame, Japan had the least number of elderly people, accounting to only 5%. However, after 2020, the country witnessed a drastic surge in the aged population, leaving the other countries behind. Hence, it finished off leading with over 25 seniors per 100 by 2040 altogether.
In contrast, USA and Sweden started off at higher levels as compared to Japan. Moreover, USA was at the top having a percentage slightly below 10, whilst Sweden landed a little below it. Nevertheless, both of them followed a fairly similar pattern for the majority of period. Following this, a slight change in trends occurred after 1990, Sweden outnumbered USA due to a sudden increase in old individuals, so much so, that by 2020 it ended up securing the second highest position after Japan, having approximately 25% elders.
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparisons w 11
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the U.K from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The chart below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity: 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01578947368 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70160001837 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.715789473684 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4329083357 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0594163466503 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241787679681 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268743962257 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462426585173 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289457935845 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.