With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The demand in oil and gas has been increased globally. Therefore, it is thought to explore undiscovered areas to find hidden resources. This essay will argue that why exploitation of new areas is more harmful than benefitting.
By opening up access to unexplored areas, the areas would become vulnerable to damage, and ultimately add up in environmental hazards. The process of drilling for extracting oil and gas causes unrecoverable damage to the surrounding by either emitting hazardous gasses making people sick or by disposing waste material into sea which can lead to killing many sea creatures. For example, Chinese government started a project for extraction of oil and gas in its northern region. During that process, there was immense disruption in sea life, and the icebergs started melting causing a rise in surrounding temperature. For this reason, it is obvious that the environment is harmed by human desires of natural resources.
Instead of looking for new areas to find more oil and gas, people should work more on renewable energy and other energy sources. By using renewable energy, there will be less harm to the environment and on the living beings. Other energy sources include solar, water and wind. In a recent study conducted in University of California, by introducing solar cars only, there is decrease in oil and gas utilization and they are echo friendly as well. Hence, using other renewable sources, the need of oil and gas can be limited to certain fields only.
In conclusion, although the demand of oil and gas has been increased globally, more concentration should be given to renewable and other forms of resources. Which in turn reduces the need of exploring more areas for oil and gas.
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives.Which viewpoint do you agree with? 73
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Are famous people treated unfairly by media Should they be given more privacy or it is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09122807018 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80068584134 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.159587219 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274295675429 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964433605906 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757301732369 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189357672605 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691751099949 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.