In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages?
It is true that in the today’s world, there has been an accelerating trend of using imported food instead of local food. While this trend is beneficial to some extent, I am firmly of the opinion that its shortcomings are weightier for the followers of this trend.
Due to distinctive climate condition of each country, some certain kinds of fruit can not be grown. For example, in tropical countries, it would be hardly to observe farmers growing apples, cherries and blueberries. As a result, these kinds of fruit should be imported from other countries. Moreover, the eating habit of different nations results in a variety of food from worldwide. Exporting food would provide more access for people of different countries enjoying various kinds of food, hence broaden their knowledge on global culinary art. What’s more, in several countries, when national food is considered as too familiar to local people, exotic food is used as unique presents in some special occasions.
However, I strongly believe that the disadvantages of using foreign food are outweighing the disadvantages. When people are inclined to be intrigued by exotic food, the quantity of imported food sold out would be larger than the amount of local food. Consequently, this will degrade the development of agriculture of the country, putting farmers in great hardship. Worse still, since imported food might be much pricier than local food in some countries, the routine of buying imported food might lead to a lavish lifestyle. More importantly, in order to keep the food fresh for a long time travelling from border to border, a huge amount of preservation chemicals would be applied into the food, which is seriously detrimental to consumers’ health.
In conclusion, although imported food helps people to be easily accessible to diverse kinds of food from all over the world, it would have negative impact on the economy development of the country and citizens’ well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | trinhthanh | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Cindrella87 | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15217391304 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74978737021 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568322981366 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9024452768 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348403693936 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125560638957 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572475755494 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202511104187 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664377106311 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.