In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages.
There is no denial that human in recent days prefer to eat a wide range of food from all around the globe rather than mere food growing in their locals. It is my firm conviction that the demerits of this trend are outweigh the advantages for the reasons I discuss in this essay.
On the one hand, little wonder that people have an opportunity to have a taste a diversity in flavour and cuisine of each nation. Needless to say, due to a specific condition of a country,for instance, tropical climate such as Vietnam or Thailand are popular with rice and fruit like durian which people can find nowhere in the world. Moreover, it is worthwhile for human to savour a variety of cuisine which is remarkable for a region in order to make the most of our life. For example, a special dish of Italia is spaghetti, sushi in Japan and so on, along with a disparity in the method of seasoning making them more unique.
At the same time, there are numerous disadvantages stem from the globalization of food market that human should take into account. First of all, having food from a far distance poses a threat to our environment in terms of carbon footprint from transportation. It is necessary for human to reduce the food miles as well as fighting the climate change by consuming fossil fuel prudently. For instance, rice is transported from Thailand to Europe or soya from Brazil to China. Consuming food on global scale also brings about a profound impact on developing nations. Food which is appropriate to the climate and land of indigent country is often exported oversea as much as possible in order to maximize profit and raise revenue of that country. However, this situation results in famine and poverty in rural communities while they are run out of food.
In conclusion, although diversity in food is one of human demands in order to make most of their life. However, people should limit the amount of foreign food to reduce the dire consequences of it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | trinhthanh | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Cindrella87 | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sen to prison commit crime when set free. What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem. 89
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages. 78
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language . Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- In the developed world, average Life expectancy is increasing.What problem will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , for
...due to a specific condition of a country,for instance, tropical climate such as Viet...
^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il fuel prudently. For instance, rice is transported from Thailand to Europe or s...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should limit the amount of foreign food to reduce the dire consequences of it. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69275362319 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60007270511 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568115942029 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5253689731 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.933333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228336108145 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711479182756 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037330230087 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136978574775 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487009492264 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.