It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view
It is no doubt that the rise of advanced technology goes hand in hand with the elimination of traditional culture have drawn a mounting concern in the society. In my perspective, I partly agree with this point of view and buy into the idea that this assumption is not accurate in some circumstances.
On the one hand, there is no wonder that the ground shaking development of modern technology has involved in the substitution of human lifestyle. Each community had a strong sense of identity due to their shared customs and belief. Since modern technology such as social network, electronic mail,... came about, they have directly affected the way people communicate and behave which brings about alteration in culture. With the rise of technology, new cultural habits are from another hemisphere are imported in a nation, in this sense, the old-fashioned cultures are removed. For instance, the taste in fashion of teenagers in Vietnam is influenced by Korean or Western countries which does not appropriate to the weather, replace the traditional way which is reserve and sophisticated.
On the other hand, technology is not completely incompatible to culture, by contrast, it advocates and gives rise to culture. In this case, some farming communities in Africa have put modern technology and equipment in agriculture, for instance,pesticide plane or watering system, which lead to the increase in profit and improve the economic. Moreover, the emergence of mobile phone help farmer to anticipate weather and manage the harvest. It is sensible to say that technology is a key element contributing to the national prosperous. In addition, without technology, particularly Internet, by no means traditional culture can be widespread and carry on in a country when time passing by, furthermore, it is a mean to introduce valuable culture to the world.
In conclusion, technology is a two-edge sword, however, if it is exploited logically, it will be an essential contributor not only to individual but also to a national culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Ngoc Nguyen | 78 | view |
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages. 78
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a psitive or negative development? 84
- Scientist say that in the future humanity will speak the same language . Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view 84
- the diagram presents the process of making smoked fish 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... such as social network, electronic mail,... came about, they have directly affect...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , pesticide
...d equipment in agriculture, for instance,pesticide plane or watering system, which lead to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25153374233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17297742907 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592024539877 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0889906362 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282420877548 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800919307801 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059552725391 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168900062836 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541248716864 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.