Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children. What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
Nowadays, owing to the financial pressure, a lot of young couples have to send their children to daycare centers where they may not receive proper care. Therefore, a large number of parents argue that it is essential for them be supplied financial assistance. My following essay will clarify the pros and cons of this motion.
At the outset, there is no doubt that not only families but also the country can reap a plethora of benefits from this policy. Initially, a fund which is set up to pay parents to stay at home and look after their babies is a contributing factor helping the child develop in a more positive way. Being well cared for and educated by their parents is likely to exert a profound impact on children’s social and cognitive skills. In addition to that, financial aid for parents is definitely a stimulant which encourages them to have children. Especially in countries with an alarming decrease in the birth rate, young couples will find it less demanding when having to face up to so much pressure from financial difficulties. On the whole, this policy is probable to bring influential outcomes to the socio – economic development of the nation.
Despite the above-mentioned benefits, there exist some shortcomings. In the first place, with the aim of setting up a fund to provide financial assistance, in all likelihood, there will be a significant increase in the tax burden on individuals. This can cause anger, demonstration, petition and rebellion in society and leave long lasting effect on the nation. Last but not least, the government also needs to spend money on tackling other more pivotal problems, which can result in budget deficit.
To encapsulate, paying for parents to take care of their kids at the young age is crucial but also arises many other issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | lily2002 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | Steven Hans Limantoro | 89 | view |
- In the future, students will have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer? 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 92
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Many graduates nowadays are finding it difficult to get a job Why do you think this is How can this problem be solved 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...may not receive proper care. Therefore, a large number of parents argue that it is essential for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, no doubt, on the whole, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95065789474 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82199075807 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8119801254 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213621908397 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652481360165 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471237074425 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120237381564 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548048563831 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.