The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables illustrate the Fair trade commerce of coffee and bananas among five European countries in 1999 compare to 2004. The data measured in million euros.
Overall, it is evident that the number of coffee selling in all countries witnessed an increase. There were three countries (switzerland, the United Kingdom, and belgium) witnessed a significant increase in bananas selling. Meanwhile, the remaining countries saw a decrease at the end of the period.
In the initial years, the higher number of coffee selling was switzerland, accounted for 3 million, and then increased twofold in the following year. Denmark and the uk saw the almost similar number at the beginning (1.5 and 1.8 million), then The uk witnessed sharply increase (20 million), while Denmark observed slightly increase at the end of the period. Regarding other nations, belgium and Sweden stood at 1 and 0.8 million each in the initial year and then saw a small increase in 2004.
Turning to bananas trading, in the first year, switzerland experienced the largest figure (15 million), after that raised to more than three times in the final year. following that, the uk figure was almost twice higher than belgium (1 and 0.6 million each), both nations experienced an increased more than five times in 2004. On the other hand, Sweden and Denmark were two countries experienced a decrease during the period. The selling stood at 1.8 and 2 million each in 1999 and then decreased just about a half in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | el-naz | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Sri Wahyuningsih | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Sonya Hsieh | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...9 compare to 2004. The data measured in million euros. Overall, it is evident that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aw a decrease at the end of the period. In the initial years, the higher number ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and then saw a small increase in 2004. Turning to bananas trading, in the first...
^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...ore than three times in the final year. following that, the uk figure was almost twice hi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98780487805 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57621289748 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475609756098 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0370479936 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862664687927 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040961164681 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607835020841 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769041444106 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681006436351 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.