The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The graphs show attention rates, which belong to developing countries and industrialised countries, about education and science in 1980 and 1990.
If we look carefully, in 1980, average schooling year was 2 years in developing countries while it was 8 years in industrialised countries. For 1990, people went to school for 10 years in ındustrialised countries as 3 times than developing countries’ people which had 3 years. To continue with, scientists and technicians were 10 and 40 people per 1000 people in 1980 in developing and industrialised countries respectively whereas they followed the 1980 by 20 and 70 people per 1000 people. In other side, in comparison, spending money for research & development was less 100 dollars than industrialised countries, which spent 150 dollars, in developing countries by 50 dollars in 1980. For 1990, industrialised countries spent much more money for it by 350 while developing countries spent almost 25 dollars.
To sum up, schooling processes, number of scientist and technician had been increasing in ındustrialised countries more than developing countries. Surprisingly, spending money for R&D had been decreasing for 10 years in developing countries rather than industrialised countries which had increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Iruki | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lê Thị Hà | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Mario Nese | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | r.hojat | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Each year, the crime rate increases.What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity? 56
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in UK 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns were 10 and 40 people per 1000 people in 1980 in developing and industrialised...
^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost 25 dollars. To sum up, schooling processes, number of scientist and techn...
^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sses, number of scientist and technician had been increasing in ındustrialised co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64397905759 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44977291423 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2379782988 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316092076473 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17358247339 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100461707608 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271733722228 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121083809534 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.