The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart depicts the distribution of the weight of inhabitants in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
In 1955, it is clear that the proportion of the ideal figure was decreased steadily when the age group gets older, from 70% to 44%. Besides that, there was a trend that the percentage of underweight people became smaller between 20-49 ages(from 68% to 14%), while the percentage of overweight and obese people getting larger(from 2% to 25%). In contrast to this, people who were underweight became more when they were older than 50 years old(at 42% finally), while fewer people had problems with overweight and obese(at 12% finally).
However, the situations were quite different in 2015. We can see from the data that, the people who reported they have ideal body declined sharply along with they grow, from 71% at 20-29 age to 4% at 60-69 age, and the unhealthy weight problem became more serious, particularly in overweight and obese, which at 25% and 60% separately.
By summarise, the citizens who live in Charlestown had become more easily out of shape in most age groups in 2015 compared to in 1955. In both years, there was a decreasing tendency to maintain an ideal weight when they get older.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | endriksugianto.es | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 11 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | anna103 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 84 | view |
- The table below show the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall a public place for hiring over the period of three years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. 78
- Can the Internet replace museums and galleries? 56
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82524271845 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54038917323 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0822113331 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137295054671 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734794823301 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650486645411 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115093014924 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698193777763 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.