tpo 24
The reading passage and the lecture are both discus the existence of animal tissues in the fossils of tyrannosaurus. With this in mind, the author states that evidence reveals the existence of blood vessels, collagen and blood cells in the bone of tyrannosaurus. The lecturer, on the other hand, contradicts all three episodes of arguments mentioned in the reading passage, believing that those reasons are skeptical.
First, both the writing and listening materials discus the soft and flexible organic substance in the channels. In this vein, the writer points out that the substance might be the remnant of blood vessels. Conversely, the professor makes it clear that the substance more likely to be the traces of bacteria colonizing the hollow.
Second, the author and the professor have different explanation about the presence of spheres inner the bone. While the author put forth the idea that the spheres could be the remains of blood cells because of their size and color, the lecturer reputes this idea. In this case, she explains that the red centers have been found in the other primitive fossils which didn’t have blood cells when they were alive. Hence, the color of spheres might just be the reddish minerals.
Finally, the writer and the speaker both discus the origin of the collagen that had been founded in the scientists test. The writer believes that collagen, the biochemical material, may associated with tissues of dinosaur’s bone. However, the speaker claims that collagen not long lasting, so observing collagen in the under-test fossils contradicts with this fact. Moreover, it is plausible that the collagen originated from the other recent sources such as skin of human touching the bones.
- tpo31 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 73
- TPO 46 3
- TPO 37 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
... First, both the writing and listening materials discus the soft and flexible organic su...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24372759857 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60018488709 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534050179211 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.308812545 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372369405972 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116370271802 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627552907266 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198250274138 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419581464689 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.