The main reason we should study history is to ensure that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past.
Write a response in which you examine your own position on the statement. Explore the extent to which you either agree or disagree with it, and support your reasoning with evidence and/or examples. Be sure to reflect on ways in which the statement might or might not be true, and how this informs your thinking on the subject.
History is an important subject of discussion. It can enlighten us on so many realms, and while doing so, it can also reveal the circumstances that led to that particular situation. The prompt states that we should study history mainly to be wary of the mistakes committed in the past. While it is one aspect of the field, it is not the only reason for which we should indulge ourselves into it. So, I disagree with the given statement, and I shall be presenting a couple of points in favor of my judgement.
Firstly, everything we achieve as mankind is documented for future generations. These things might have a positive or negative effect on our surroundings. For example, recently, scientists have advanced greatly in the medical field and there are well-written records of the studies conducted by the scientists, records that in future will be a part of history. Using these historical documents, our future generations might be able to create some new and more effective cure for a particular disease. They might even usher a new avenue for research. So, there is nothing significant to learn from our mistakes in the bygone age. Moreover, studying such historical records might give them answer to problems they are facing. We, ourselves have studied history of medical science as it progressed though the ancient times and as a result have derived many cures that we use at present. History not only teaches us about our ancestors, it gives us identity.
By studying history, we can analyze a situation and act accordingly. Our forefathers might have faced similar situation and by following the steps taken by them, we can help ourselves out of the difficulty. For example, if on an island, after some natural calamity, the water level rises, then the people would be better prepared if they study their history. There could be historical data that suggests the signs of such natural calamity and how to evade it. So, studying history would certainly save thousands of life under such circumstances.
One would argue that the most valuable thing we learn from history is often contained in the mistakes of out predecessors. But as I have tried to make clear using examples and hypotheticals, it is not the case. Certainly there is a place to learn from mistakes while studying history, but in my opinion, it is not it's primary function.
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substanda 77
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with the honest assessment. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 50
- The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine:“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93216080402 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76752264423 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530150753769 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7258762064 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2272727273 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175131607833 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537477874367 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554391108414 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116861883987 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592273935571 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.