The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart illustrates the ratio of people from the United Kingdom donating funds to the trust by different age groups in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, fund donation increases according to age, and youth donations occupy a major proportion earlier. Whereas older people are giving money later and young are the least donor for both years.
According to the chart, in 1990, 18-25 groups covers the least donation of nearly 17%. It goes on increasing order till 36-50 and these groups funded just more than 40% and which was a significant proportion that year. In addition, groups above it slightly reduce their funds to the charity. Also, the group above 65 donates just below 35%.
Next year in 2010, all age groups from 18-25 to 36-50 decline their funds by 10% still the cluster 18-25 were the least contributor. The age group more than 50 upsurge its ratio, where 51-65 portrays almost 40% and greater than 65 has 35% of the fund. Even the age group 51-65 is the highest donating clusters in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries, most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buying them.What are the advantages and disadvantages of renting a home? 73
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 73
- Teenage offenders should be treated in the same way as adult criminals.Do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'upsurge' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'upsurges'.
Suggestion: upsurges
...contributor. The age group more than 50 upsurge its ratio, where 51-65 portrays almost ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81502890173 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17150328331 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1334858882 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172665370516 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762337380675 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651943028157 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124332275163 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507390120805 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.