Does the use of computer/technology benefit the educational process
In today’s modern world technology has become essential. Phones, laptops and so many other means are all used in our everyday life. However, People today tend to focus more on the use of technology within the context of education. While for some it may sound as a good idea to combine the use of technology and education together, for others it is not.
To begin with, the use of technology can smooth the process of learning. Many students today struggle to keep up with their classmates’ pace, but with the help of technology they could easily overcome that. Students now can use the technology to look for reliable resources such as videos, articles which could help them understand their course material better. Not only the use of technology makes the process of learning easier, but it also enhances the students-teacher relationship. Sometimes students might not be able to ask questions to their teachers due to their shyness and embarrassment, and that could hamper students’ academic performance. However, with the use of technology students might be able to do so since they could easily reach their teachers through either Email or Facebook.
Although the use of technology may offer students some great benefits, it is still not right for them. One of the main challenges of technology is that it requires a great self-control since it is too addictive. Students in such an age are still not mature enough to handle its use. Therefore, allowing them to use it will only lead them to concentrate less on their studies. Another side or ill effect of technology on students is that it kills their creativity. Instead of depending on themselves, Students now use the means of technology like internet to just copy and past the information so they can get a good grade. In other words, the use of technology doesn’t only kill students’ creativity, but it also lead to incompetency.
As a conclusion, There are always two side of the coin and technology is not excluded. While some may support technology, others may not. Sometimes the use of technology may help students to improve their abilities of learning and even enhance the relationship between students and their teachers. However, technology may not help sometimes. Instead of helping students, technology may have the opposite results since it can be both addictive and hard to handle; adding to it that it kills creativity too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | Adam.Mortada | 42 | view |
- What are the things you want to change at the your university which would help its education function better 67
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Watching television is bad for children. to what extent do u agree or disagree 56
- Free educaiton 11
- Is homeschooling compatible with better than traditional schooling 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e it may sound as a good idea to combine the use of technology and education toge...
^^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
... students' creativity, but it also lead to incompetency. As a conclusion, Ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05236907731 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95374927796 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486284289277 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.17838188 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0909090909 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238503599584 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905646276099 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05702178978 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16303475724 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353285620489 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.