Do you argree or desagree that romantic relationships will be enough to happy marriage.
Today there is no shortage of debate that all romantic relationships commonly lead to happy marriage. A lot of people believe in it, because they suppose that this relationship involves a strong bond between partners. However, others think that romantic relationships usually are not a cause of happy life together and I also support this point of view for some reasons.
First of all, there are two different types of relationships: healthy and unhealthy. It is common knowledge that people who have a first sort of relationships are always happy and they enjoy every moments spending together. Although, if people have the former type of relationships, they will experience a lot of difficulties through mutual live. It is happening because unhealthy relationship consists of jealous and isolation which are a cause of many quarrels, so people just cannot live together, despite that they are in the romantic period. For example, my aunt had a boyfriend and they used to spend all time together. Unfortunately, when they got married, her husband started to be jealous of everybody. Moreover, he prohibited her to talk and to meet with her friends. For this reason, there is no guarantee that romantic relationships will always be happy.
Secondly, there are a lot of occasions when feelings fade away. It is definitely true that all things of our world have the inclination to end. Furthermore, feelings are not an exception. It often happened during the continuous relationship, because there are some cases when people just bother each other. In addition, if people annoy each other, their together life will be unbearable and cumbersome. According to my sister`s experience, when she was in relationships, she felt that it would be astounding to spend all this live with this person. So, she made a decision and finally got married. Regrettably, her boyfriend was extremely pesky and irksome, so they ultimately divorced. It is a one more reason which prove my point of view toward romantic relationship.
By the way of conclusion, based on arguments explored above, romantic relationship can be happy and enjoyably, but on the other hand it cannot be a sign of blissful marriage.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the point made in the article 71
- It has recently been announced that a new high school may be built in your community. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details in your answer. 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage 3
- Some companies decided to not permit employees to reply the e-mail or text assciated with the work in the holliday or on weekends. Some people think that this policy will improve satisfaction of employees. While other argue that policy. What do you think? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, sort of, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13407821229 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01093478601 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54469273743 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8420919412 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5238095238 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221648331637 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657428849834 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781378544756 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169331993516 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611668310093 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.