Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past It was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Working is a catch-all term referring to any activity done by people in order to bear the expenses of life. Every individual seeks a decent job to build a prosperous future. As far as I'm concerned, the way that people can find a suitable career for themselves is a way harder than it used to be. Two main factors are contributing to this matter which are elaborated on hereunder.
The first factor is that as there used to be fewer job variation in the past, people could identify the best career for themselves with less effort. To be more specific, it's believed that when humans encounter a wide range of a different subjects, it sparks confusion to scrutinize every aspect of their merits and drawbacks, and therefore, they could not distinguish the best one. The same concept is true about opting for a suitable career out of a myriad job opportunities in the modern era. For instance, back in a time when people were living in villages, there were a handful of livelihood and people had to either work as a farmer or shepherd. As a result, people weren't overwhelmed by different working options, and they could simply start to make a living at an early age. However, in recent years, the confusion arose from various job positions is hindering people's ability to identify the most assuring career for them.
The second decisive factor is that population growth has led to an increasing number of experts in every field, resulting in a tough competition among individuals in order to be successful in their own specialties. Nowadays, when someone tries to show his potential in a specific area, he needs to defeat all the competitors in order to achieve success in the long run. For example, Consider a person who was captivated by serving as a doctor several years ago. Since there weren't many accomplished doctors available, people had to pay the existing ones for treatment. As a result, whoever started their career in medical science could make enough money to build a thriving future. On the other hand, with the upsurge in the number of skillful doctors, one has to work diligently to earn a good reputation for his capability of curing patients, attracting patients to schedule an appointment at their office.
According to the above analysis, it is safe to say that the procedure of finding a suitable job for a secure future is going to be a much more arduous path for everyone. It is because job diversification is confusing people in this process and because an intense competition in each particular career among people is blocking their way of identifying a proper job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-08 | eglantine74 | 91 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor. 73
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 95
- TPO 39 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involving in their children's education than were parents in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past It was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...to build a prosperous future. As far as Im concerned, the way that people can find...
^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'subject'?
Suggestion: subject
...s encounter a wide range of a different subjects, it sparks confusion to scrutinize ever...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...farmer or shepherd. As a result, people werent overwhelmed by different working option...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...a doctor several years ago. Since there werent many accomplished doctors available, pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82286995516 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7741733045 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54932735426 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7657930705 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114899814929 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394504370464 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422881630509 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0728505737558 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167331248709 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.