The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010.
The table below shows the proportions of people using several mobile phone functions between 2006 and 2010.
Overall, except for making calls and playing games, the percentages of owners using the other phone’s features tend to increase over 4 years. The most popular function was making calls.
Although all users used their phone for making calls in 2006 and 2008, the percentage of using this service decreased slightly to 99% which was still the highest point in 2010. While the rates of playing games rose quickly from 17% (2006) to 42% (2008) before reduced to 41% (2010), the proportion of searching the Internet went up dramatically from no data (2006) to 73% (2010).
The rates of playing music and recording video also climbed rapidly from 12% and no data (2006) to 26% and 35% (2010), respectively. Besides, there was a slow increase in the percentage of taking photos and commuting by text messages from 66% and 73% (2006) to just over three-fourths (2010), respectively.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- The picture illustrates the process of maturity from eggs of the honey bee. 67
- The chart gives information about UK immigration emigration and net migration between 1999 and 2008 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53805070246 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615853658537 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0067298699 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4107825325 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224564742383 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.318659613539 0.0843802449381 378% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346978784805 0.15604864568 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.37996296887 0.0819641961636 464% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.