People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
I agree to the given statement that people who make decisions based on emotion are indeed poor decision makers. Humans by nature have emotional needs and those needs try to shape a persons personality. When it comes to making decisions, emotional factor also comes to play but a good decision maker would know how much to take into account.
As a human, we make various decisions in everyday life and all those decisions are of different importance. Some are logical whereas some may be whimsical. But when it comes to important decisions, it best that all factors be taken into account and eliminate any repercussions forehand. People who make decisions based on emotions may not consider those facts and try to justify them with silly logic. Also not all decisions are justifiable. Some decisions hold personal interests which are inconceivable to others.
Furthermore, we can see many examples of failures caused by such emotional decisions in our society be it a failed business or marriage. Decisions solely based on emotions are not backed by proper calculations of what outcomes it will elicit and if those outcomes are really favorable for you. For example, when starting a football kit shop, one should not solely start it because he loves football but also look at the factors like location, possible customer, craze for football in the area etc. One may defend his decision with logic afterwards but he cannot defend the fact that his business is doomed if the conditions are not favorable.
In conclusion, I would like to say that it is not necessary every emotional decisions bring peril in your life, but the instances that such decisions have proven good is very few. People who make emotion based decision tend to follow heart believing that the heart knows what you want but forget to take brain along with it. Such people have hard time making decisions that are beneficial to them and the ones around them. So, I believe people who make decisions based on emotion are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar. 62
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- "Manned space flight is costly and more dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the cost and risks associated with se 47
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r decision makers. Humans by nature have emotional needs and those needs try to s...
^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...al needs and those needs try to shape a persons personality. When it comes to making de...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bests', 'wells'?
Suggestion: bests; wells
...hen it comes to important decisions, it best that all factors be taken into account ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d try to justify them with silly logic. Also not all decisions are justifiable. Some...
^^^^
Line 4, column 401, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding ones'?
Suggestion: the surrounding ones
...cisions that are beneficial to them and the ones around them. So, I believe people who make decision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, really, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92352941176 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56136452605 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.432604817 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4705882353 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.620664619279 0.243740707755 255% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224885690103 0.0831039109588 271% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190000345445 0.0758088955206 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3931726974 0.150359130593 261% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110207045025 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.