The word question
The pie charts below explicate information percentage about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years by 1995 until 2005. Overal, it Can be seen that the highest percentage was coal while the most negative was gas.
In the one hand in 1995 it been see the coal get 29.80% which the highest category, adjoining by percentage gas which was 29.63% was the second higher. Interval percentage of petro was 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4.90%.
On the other hand in 2005 the coal get elevated almost 1.13%. it been see the gas also get 0.68%.in addition the petro percentage decreased drastically until 9.72%, followed with the Nuclear get decreased 3.07% percentage. But the last there was Other get increase d 4.02%.
There are also increasing unscore that is can been see percentage of petro and Nuclear get decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 11 | view |
- The word question 11
- The chart below show the percentage of female and male teachers in six different types of educational setting in UK in 2010. 84
- The line chart below show The percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures from Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The pie chart compares the proportion of enrolments on six different courses at a UK collegeof education in 2010 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years by 199...
^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...o was 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4....
^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...as 29.27% and Nuclear get was 6.40%. in the persist percentage other get was 4.90%. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...005 the coal get elevated almost 1.13%. it been see the gas also get 0.68%.in addi...
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'canned'.
Suggestion: canned
...ere are also increasing unscore that is can been see percentage of petro and Nuclea...
^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...ere are also increasing unscore that is can been see percentage of petro and Nuclear get...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94078947368 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52178012523 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546052631579 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3446100946 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.